Heptadecanoids are a specific subclass of bioactive lipids, derived from heptadecanoic acid (C17:0), a saturated fatty acid with a 17-carbon backbone. This lipid category is gaining considerable attention in biological research due to its involvement in several metabolic pathways and potential implications in health and disease. Unlike more commonly studied fatty acids, heptadecanoic acid and its derivatives, collectively known as heptadecanoids, offer unique biological properties, particularly in signaling, inflammation regulation, and energy metabolism.
Heptadecanoic acid can be found naturally in various sources, including butterfat, certain fish oils, and ruminant animal products. Although it occurs in relatively low concentrations, recent studies suggest that heptadecanoids could play a significant role in cardiovascular health, insulin sensitivity, and the immune response. Because of their unique properties, the study and quantification of heptadecanoids have become critical in advancing our understanding of lipid metabolism and its broader physiological implications.
Creative Proteomics offers a comprehensive heptadecanoids analysis service that specializes in the detailed profiling and quantification of heptadecanoic acid and its derivatives.
Lipid Profiling: We analyze the full spectrum of heptadecanoids in biological samples (plasma, serum, tissues, food), identifying various forms of heptadecanoic acid and related metabolites for a comprehensive lipid profile.
Quantification of Heptadecanoids: Utilizing LC-MS/MS and GC-MS techniques, we precisely quantify heptadecanoids, even at trace levels, to elucidate their roles in metabolic processes and inflammation.
Biomarker Identification: Our service identifies potential heptadecanoid biomarkers associated with diseases or metabolic disorders, facilitating therapeutic and diagnostic exploration.
Comparative Studies: We conduct comparative analyses of heptadecanoid levels across different conditions (dietary changes, drug treatments, disease states) to reveal their physiological and pathological significance.
Data Interpretation: Creative Proteomics provides expert interpretation of lipidomics data, offering insights into the impact of heptadecanoids on cardiovascular health, metabolic regulation, and immune responses.
Heptadecanoic Acid (C17:0) | Heptadecanoic Acid Methyl Ester | Heptadecadienoic Acid (C17:2) | Heptadecatrienoic Acid (C17:3) |
Heptadecanol | Heptadecanoyl-CoA | Heptadecanoyl-Phosphatidylcholine |
Liquid Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (LC-MS/MS)
LC-MS/MS is one of the most powerful tools for heptadecanoid analysis. This technique allows for the separation, detection, and quantification of lipid species with high sensitivity and specificity. Creative Proteomics uses advanced LC-MS/MS platforms for both targeted and untargeted lipidomics, ensuring that even low-abundance heptadecanoids can be accurately measured. This method is ideal for identifying novel heptadecanoids and tracking changes in lipid profiles across different experimental conditions.
Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS)
For the analysis of saturated fatty acids like heptadecanoic acid, GC-MS remains a gold-standard technique. Creative Proteomics applies GC-MS for the quantification of heptadecanoic acid in biological samples, offering unparalleled precision and reproducibility. The technique is particularly suited for studies focused on fatty acid composition in food, tissue, and serum samples.
High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)
HPLC is another critical tool used in the separation and quantification of heptadecanoids. HPLC is often paired with UV or fluorescence detection for specific applications where mass spectrometry may not be required. Creative Proteomics offers HPLC-based methods for routine quantification and characterization of heptadecanoids, especially in quality control and comparative studies.
Sample Type | Required Amount | Storage Conditions | Notes |
---|---|---|---|
Plasma/Serum | 100-200 µL | -80°C | Collect in EDTA or heparin tubes; avoid hemolysis. |
Tissue (Liver, Muscle) | 50-100 mg | -80°C | Snap freeze in liquid nitrogen immediately after collection. |
Cell Pellets | 1-2 x 106 cells | -80°C | Wash cells with PBS before freezing; snap freeze immediately. |
Food Samples | 500 mg | -20°C or lower | Homogenize samples before freezing for uniform extraction. |
Urine | 500 µL | -80°C | Store in aliquots to avoid freeze-thaw cycles; ensure sterile collection. |
If you have any questions about our lipidomics services, please contact us.
Case Chronic Atrophic Gastritis: Metabolite and Microbiota Interplay as Non-Invasive Biomarkers
Background
Chronic Atrophic Gastritis (CAG) is an inflammatory condition that leads to the loss of gastric mucosal glands, significantly elevating the risk of gastric cancer (GC). Traditional diagnostic methods, primarily gastroscopy with tissue biopsy, are invasive and carry several drawbacks, creating a need for non-invasive alternatives.
Recent research highlights the role of metabolites as potential biomarkers for the progression from chronic superficial gastritis (CSG) to gastric cancer. Metabolites like azelaic acid and glutamate may indicate GC risk, and interventions from traditional Chinese medicine have shown promise in modulating these metabolites in CAG models.
Additionally, the gut microbiota interacts with the gastrointestinal tract, producing functional metabolites that influence host metabolism and inflammation. Dysbiosis in gut microbiota has been linked to the development of CAG, suggesting a relationship between microbial composition and disease progression.
Despite the known crosstalk between gut microbiota and metabolites, there is limited research on this interaction in CAG patients. This study aims to clarify the gut microbiota and metabolite profiles in the feces of CAG patients, exploring their potential as non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosis.
Materials & Methods
Samples
The study included a total of 66 healthy volunteers and 110 patients diagnosed with chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) who underwent endoscopic examinations at Shanghai University of TCM-affiliated hospitals. The participants were categorized into different sample sets:
Participants met specific inclusion criteria for CAG diagnosis based on pathological examinations, while those with gastric polyps, tumors, or other gastrointestinal issues were excluded. All clinical information was collected via questionnaires, and informed consent was obtained from all participants. Fecal samples were promptly frozen at -80°C after collection for analysis.
Technical Methods
Targeted Fecal Metabolomics Profiling
DNA Extraction and 16S rRNA Sequencing
Data Analysis
Feature Selection and Statistical Analysis
This comprehensive methodology aims to elucidate the interplay between gut microbiota and metabolites in patients with CAG, potentially identifying non-invasive biomarkers for diagnosis.
Results
Serum Lipid Profiles in CAG Patients
Increased Levels: Serum levels of bile acid, total cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) were significantly higher in patients with Chronic Atrophic Gastritis (CAG) compared to healthy controls (HC), with a p-value of < 0.05.
No Significant Difference: No significant differences were observed in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol, triglycerides, or total bilirubin levels between the two groups.
Fecal Metabolite Profiles
Diverse Metabolite Categories: A total of 146 metabolites across 16 categories were identified in fecal samples from CAG patients and healthy volunteers. Key categories included amino acids, bile acids, fatty acids, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs).
PLS-DA Analysis: PLS-DA revealed a distinct separation between the metabolite profiles of CAG patients and healthy controls, indicating significant differences in fecal metabolites.
Differential Metabolites: In the CAG group, 35 fecal metabolites showed significant differences compared to healthy controls:
Metabolic Pathway Enrichment
Key Pathways: KEGG analysis highlighted several metabolic pathways associated with the altered metabolites, including:
Fecal Gut Microbiota Profiles
Alpha-Diversity: No significant differences in the Sobs index and Shannon index, indicating similar diversity levels in gut microbiota between CAG patients and healthy controls.
LEfSe Analysis: Significant differences were found in the bacterial composition:
Functional Analysis of Gut Microbiota
PICRUSt Analysis: The functional potential of gut microbiota in CAG patients indicated involvement in carbohydrate and amino acid metabolism, energy metabolism, and various biosynthetic processes.
Feature Selection and Classification Models
Fecal Metabolites: Using Random Forest (RF), a set of 7 fecal metabolites was identified as biomarkers, achieving an accuracy of 93.8% in distinguishing CAG patients from healthy controls.
Gut Microbes: A separate analysis identified 4 gut microbes, achieving an accuracy of 92.3%.
Combined Model: A classification model incorporating both metabolites and gut microbes achieved robust classification performance, underscoring the potential for these biomarkers in diagnosing CAG.
Alteration of fecal-derived metabolites profiles in CAG_a patients.
Alteration of fecal-derived metabolites profiles in CAG_c patients.
Alteration of fecal-derived gut microbiota profiles in CAG_b patients.
Enriched gut microbiota profiles in feces of CAG_b patients and/or HC_b healthy volunteers.
Reference
Services:
Online Inquiry
CONTACT US